Radcliffe Chambers logo


Members of Chambers edit or contribute to a number of leading textbooks. They also write articles for relevant legal journals, with recent examples as follows:

Actual loss must be shown for a successful wrongful trading claim

Mark Mullen considers the case of Re Ralls Builders Ltd for Lexis PSL.


"Good forum shopping": the scheme jurisdiction and Re Codere Finance (UK) Ltd

Martin Ouwehand explores the issues in Re Codere Finance (UK) Ltd for Lexis Nexis Restructuring and Insolvency.


'A sporting chance' Is there right to use sporting & recreational facilities, asks Mark West

Mark West contributes to the latest edition of the New Law Journal.


'Auto-enrolment—guidance on when travelling workers are considered based in Great Britain' Henry Day is interviewed by LexisPSL Pensions.

The following interview given by Henry Day to LexisPSL Pensions examines the recent case of R (on the application of Fleet Maritime Services (Bermuda) Ltd) v Pensions Regulator [2015] EWHC 3744 (Admin) and the territorial scope of the Pensions Act 2008.


No Relief From the Supreme Court

Dov Ohrenstein considers the significance in the Supreme Court’s decision in Thevarajah v Riordan [2015] UKSC 78  which addressed the question of whether belated compliance with an unless order could amount to a material change in circumstances for the purposes of setting aside a refusal to grant relief from sanction.


The latest release for Wurtzburg and Mills on Building Society Law has been published and distributed to subscribers.

This release includes a re-issue of the chapter on unfairness in consumer contracts to cover the decision in Plevin and the impact of changes in the law on unfair terms resulting from the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and recent decisions of the CJEU.


Setting things straight on rectification proceedings’, Henry Day is interviewed by LexisPSL Pensions

Henry Day has been interviewed by LexisPSL Pensions on the decision in Re BCA Pension Plan [2015] EWHC 3492 (Ch). “Setting things straight on rectification proceedings”


Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill

Francesca Quint has provided a commentary on this Bill and its key clauses


Marks & Spencers – Refunds and implied terms

Dov Ohrenstein analyses this judgment. “Last week’s decision of the Supreme Court in Marks & Spencers v BNP Paribas [2015] UKSC 72 should be of interest to anyone considering the question of how and when a court will imply terms into contracts.”

Showing 10 of 89 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Mailing List

To keep up to date with news, publications and seminars from Radcliffe Chambers please fill in the form below. Submitting the form indicates that you agree to our privacy policy.

I am interested in: